We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

How much sway case regulation holds may well vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances from the current case. To investigate this concept, evaluate the following case regulation definition.

What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty in the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Just some years back, searching for case precedent was a complicated and time consuming endeavor, requiring individuals to search through print copies of case law, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search possibilities, and lots of sources offer free access to case law.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation website from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more

We're an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed with the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a nicely-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, be certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government guidelines for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Even though the few had two youthful children of their possess at home, the social worker did not explain to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement within the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the couple experienced young children.

Preceding four tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

The figured out Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced through the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence in the respective parties. Read more